/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) lexical decision (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: lexical decision
Is in goldstandard
1
paper CO_FormayFuncióntxt2 - : HINO, Y., & LUPKER, S. J. (1998). “The effects of word frequency for Japanese Kana and Kanji words in naming and lexical decision: Can the dual-route model save the lexical-selection account ?” En Journal of experimental psychology: human perception and performance, 24, 1431-1453. [ [81]Links ]
2
paper corpusRLAtxt173 - : Hino, Yasushi; Lupker, Stephen J. y Pexman, Penny M. (2002). Ambiguity and Synonymy Effects in Lexical Decision, Naming, and Semantic Categorization Task: Interactions Between Ortography, Phonology, and Semantics, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 28 .4, 686-713. [ [91]Links ]
Evaluando al candidato lexical decision:
lexical decision
Lengua:
Frec: 29
Docs: 16
Nombre propio: 1 / 29 = 3%
Coocurrencias con glosario:
Puntaje: 0.169 = ( + (1+0) / (1+4.90689059560852)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| lexical decision |
: 12. Lam, Y., Pérez-Leroux, A. T. y Ramírez, C. (2003). Using lexical decision for Spanish language placement testing. Presentado en AAAL Conference, Washington D.C. : Adelman, J. S., Brown, G. D. & Quesada, J. F. (2006). Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times. Psychological Science, 17(9), 814-823. : Conrad, M., Carreiras, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2008). Contrasting effects of token and type syllable frequency in lexical decision. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(2), 296-326. : Conrad, Markus, Stenneken, Prisca y Jacobs, Arthur M. (2006). Associated or dissociated effects of syllable frequency in lexical decision and naming. Psycho-nomic Bulletin & Review. 13, pp. 339-345. : GRAINGER, J. Y SEGUÍ, J. (1990). “Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: a comparison of lexical decision and masked identificaton latencies”. En Perception and psychophysics, 47, 191-198. : González-Nosti, María, Barbón, Analía, Rodríguez-Ferreira, Javier y Cuetos, Fernando. (2014). Effects of the psycholinguistic variables on the lexical decision tasks in Spanish: a study with 2,765 words. Behavior Research Methods. 46, 517-525. : Grainger, J. (1990). Word frequency and the neighbourhood frequency effects in lexical decision and word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 228-244. : Holcomb, P. J., & Neville, H. (1990). Auditory and Visual Semantic Priming in Lexical Decision: A Comparison Using Event-Related Potentials. Language and Cognitive Processes, 5, 281-312. : Ortells, J.J., Tudela, P. , Noguera, C. y Abad, M.J. (1998). Attentional orienting within the visual field in a lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1675-1689. : Perea, M., Rosa, E., & Gómez, C. (2002). Is the go/no-go lexical decision task an alternative to the yes/no lexical decision task? Memory & Cognition, 30(1), 34-45. : Segalowitz, N., Watson, V., & Segalowitz, S. (1995). Vocabulary skill: Single-case assessment of automaticity of word recognition in a timed lexical decision task. Second Language Research, 11, 121-136. : The homophones pálè father/friends in 4 and waya in defeat/wire in 5 can only be distinguished contextually. They are phonetically and orthographically identical and both pairs can be used in lexical decision task to investigate word recognition (Martin, 1982). |